<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for WeigleWilczek Company Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weiglewilczek.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weiglewilczek.com/blog</link>
	<description>Get an inside view of our daily office life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:34 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to setup a Scala project with SBT and IDEA by Using Scala Build Tool with Liftweb and IntelliJ - Philip Andrew, Hong Kong, Scala Programming and I.T. business</title>
		<link>http://www.weiglewilczek.com/blog/?p=2636&#038;cpage=1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Scala Build Tool with Liftweb and IntelliJ - Philip Andrew, Hong Kong, Scala Programming and I.T. business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5453594210552123250.post-272952326927632855#comment-185</guid>
		<description>[...] but I failed, then I tried a more simple attempt to get a simple Scala project to work using this persons instructions and it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but I failed, then I tried a more simple attempt to get a simple Scala project to work using this persons instructions and it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scala 2.8: Be more concise with named and default arguments by Alexey Aristov</title>
		<link>http://www.weiglewilczek.com/blog/?p=1203&#038;cpage=1#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexey Aristov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5453594210552123250.post-313365544165984631#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Almost like in visual basic. :)

Let&#039;s see what else this maniacs will add into a language (i heard something about STM). If they will continue like this Scala will become Algol68 of 21 century.

&quot;ALGOL 68 has been criticized, most prominently by some members of its design committee such as C. A. R. Hoare and Edsger Dijkstra, for abandoning the simplicity of ALGOL 60 becoming a vehicle for complex or overly general ideas, and doing little to make the compiler writer&#039;s task easy, in contrast to deliberately simple contemporaries (and competitors) such as C, S-algol and Pascal.&quot; (from wikipedia)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost like in visual basic. <img src='http://www.weiglewilczek.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what else this maniacs will add into a language (i heard something about STM). If they will continue like this Scala will become Algol68 of 21 century.</p>
<p>&#8220;ALGOL 68 has been criticized, most prominently by some members of its design committee such as C. A. R. Hoare and Edsger Dijkstra, for abandoning the simplicity of ALGOL 60 becoming a vehicle for complex or overly general ideas, and doing little to make the compiler writer&#8217;s task easy, in contrast to deliberately simple contemporaries (and competitors) such as C, S-algol and Pascal.&#8221; (from wikipedia)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OSGi-fied Scala libraries updated to 2.7.6 by Alex Blewitt</title>
		<link>http://www.weiglewilczek.com/blog/?p=1193&#038;cpage=1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Blewitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5453594210552123250.post-4540443352741375628#comment-137</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also some talk of bugs getting in to 2.7.6 as well ... people might be well advised to stick with 2.7.5 in the meantime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also some talk of bugs getting in to 2.7.6 as well &#8230; people might be well advised to stick with 2.7.5 in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
